Of course, if you have to use it because your collaborators do, that's something elese. Endnote's styles editor is the same as it was ten years ago and about all of its unique selling points (connection files, available style files) are paralleled or surpassed by its competition. The only thing stable about Endnote is the update cycle – a $100 update every year. While it's still widely used and considered THE STANDARD by many, it's incredibly buggy and hasn't seen any substantial updates for a long time. The answer does of course depend on the OS (I guess it's windows) you're using and your specific situation, but in general I'd try to avoid Endnote if possible. I just throw all PDF files into a folder without any "management"(but I name them with good file names using titles), thus, either I can find the paper PDF quickly just based on my fresh brain memory or just Google it for those old papers. I think in the "Google" era, the folder and some built-in searching functions is not needed anymore. What's more, a lot of ref manager tools claim that they are good at managing or searching PDF files and abstracts. So far, endnotes/jabref+word/latex+win/mac/linux make my academic writing more like programming, I just focus on the research itself and never spend time on the labor working. The use-case is that we use tools to make the bibliography issue as automatic as possible. And it supports hundreds of bibliography formats, what the hell is that feature? any modern researcher needs to copy the those reference with formats manually ? I think the most cases is that writing academic paper is more "design" or "programming" rather than "writing" or "editing". As I mentioned, the "cloud storage" is not very urgent for me. I hate to register another account for this one. If you really need, dropbox, icloud and other tools have solved this problem perfectly. "Displaying authors names intelligently" kick a lot of tools out.Īlso, the "cloud storage" feature is also not very useful for me. ![]() However, they are "common" reference tools and their features are not killing features for me. The Mendeley and other fashion tools are beautiful than Jabref. So far, my solution works perfect for me. JabRef can display "Tom and Jack" or "John et al." in the database! This feature is killing feature if you are confusing so many different confusing middle/first/last names from authors from different countries! Jabref is also supporting you fix some bib items manually because, as you know, some bibtex item downloaded from ACM/IEEE are not perfect and contain messy strings. Besides the basic reference management functions, it can find duplicate items and even can display "correct" author names! For example. In win/word case, it is BEST) Īlso, I use Jabref for latex case on win/mac platforms. Thus, I decide: Use Endnotes for windows/Word case (Endnote is not bad and it can import/export rich formats and work perfectly with MS word. My case is sometimes I work on win/ms word, sometimes I work on Mac/linux/latex or win/latex. And some tools are ugly and some are expensive. I found that there is no PERFECT tool so far which can deal all kinds of reference formats(latex/word) on all OS (win/linux/mac) platforms. However, several months passed, I'll share my experience and my simple conclusion. Thank for all of you providing so many exciting tools. Not sure if it checks for duplicates on merge, but there is a tool for checking for duplicates as well: Tools -> Scan database -> Find duplicates. Or rather, for importing one file into another: File -> Import into current database. ![]() Is there a way to check for duplicate files?.The script that says Clean Duplicates can be modified. ![]() I recently discovered this cool tool by Andreas Fischlin's tools: ethz. But, since BibDesk has AppleScript support, some people have written tools for cleaning duplicates. Jabref is better at detecting the duplicates than BibDesk.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |